Demystifying Indirect Cost Rate Proposals

Maximize Reimbursements for Your Agency

Our service guides local governments through preparing Indirect Cost Rate Proposals (ICRPs) for federal grants, calculating rates that capture overhead while adhering to 2 CFR Part 200, ensuring audit-ready submissions and higher recoveries without added burdens.

What Are Indirect Cost Rate Proposals?

Indirect Cost Rate Proposals (ICRPs) are formal submissions used by local governments to calculate and justify rates for recovering overhead costs (e.g., facilities, administration) from federal grants, as defined in 2 CFR Part 200.

In California, ICRPs must align with the State Controller's Office (SCO) and cognizant federal agencies (e.g., Caltrans for transportation), ensuring costs are allowable, reasonable, and allocable to benefit multiple objectives.

At GCP, we demystify this process by turning intricate regulations into straightforward, audit-ready proposals that maximize reimbursements. Our services address challenges like unallowable costs, rate negotiations, and extensions (e.g., one-time under 2 CFR 200.414(g)).

With over 200 California cities and 40 counties as clients (including 24 of the state's 25 largest agencies) we bring proven expertise to prepare ICRPs that support expanded programs without taxpayer burden.

Key Benefits of Demystifying Indirect Cost Rate Proposals

Higher Reimbursements

Secure maximum federal/state funds with precise, compliant rates, as an ICRP is a strategic tool to recapture admin costs tied to grants.

Long-Term Sustainability

Build processes for ongoing recoveries and fiscal health, including one-time extensions under 2 CFR 200.414(g).

Audit and Compliance Protection

Meet OMB/SCO standards, minimizing risks of denials or repayments through allowable cost principles.

Tailored Proposals

Customize for grants, incorporating agency-specific overhead like facilities and administration.

Our Proven Process

1

Cost Identification

Review allowable indirect costs (facilities/admin) per 2 CFR Part 200 and SCO guidelines.

2

Rate Calculation and Documentation

Develop methodologies, calculate rates, and prepare detailed proposals.

3

Submission and Negotiation

Guide approvals with cognizant agencies (e.g., Caltrans), including adjustments for unallowable costs.

4

Implementation and Monitoring

Integrate into grants, provide audit support, and monitor for extensions/sustainability.

Real Results: Case Studies

Meet Our Indirect Cost Rate Proposal Experts

Brad Wilkes

Integrated ICRs with cost allocation for agencies like City of Santa Rosa.

Brad Wilkes Bio

Brad Burgess

Oversaw costing practices, including ICRs for grant optimization.

Brad Burgess Bio

Jeff Wakefield

Prepared federal ICRs in cost plans for cities like Fresno.

Jeff Wakefield Bio

Cindy Sconce

Led ICR review and preparation for Santa Barbara County and the City of Santa Ana, ensuring compliance and accuracy.

Cindy Sconce Bio

Ruben Rivas

Supported ICR analyses in state mandate reimbursement for audit readiness.

Ruben Rivas Bio